<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Open Source Promise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/</link>
	<description>The Art of Being Open</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mindquarry GO Launched - Get 3 Beta Tester Accounts (by Sandro Groganz)</title>
		<link>http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindquarry GO Launched - Get 3 Beta Tester Accounts (by Sandro Groganz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>[...] With Mindquarry GO, we are joining the ranks of Open Source companies offering their products as Software as a Service (SaaS). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Mindquarry GO, we are joining the ranks of Open Source companies offering their products as Software as a Service (SaaS). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-7474</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-7474</guid>
		<description>Ian is raising up an important issue here, and among &lt;a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/04/06/open-source-business-models-a-taxonomy-of-open-source-firms%e2%80%99-business-models/" rel="nofollow"&gt;open source firms&lt;/a&gt; I believe that being able to &lt;a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/06/02/open-source-firms-enterprisedb-business-model/" rel="nofollow"&gt;contribute back&lt;/a&gt; will become more and more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian is raising up an important issue here, and among <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/04/06/open-source-business-models-a-taxonomy-of-open-source-firms%e2%80%99-business-models/" rel="nofollow">open source firms</a> I believe that being able to <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/06/02/open-source-firms-enterprisedb-business-model/" rel="nofollow">contribute back</a> will become more and more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Nieves</title>
		<link>http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Nieves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandro.groganz.com/weblog/2007/05/03/the-open-source-promise/#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>I think that for all kinds of companies (IT or not) Open Source communities/software/etc. is going to be a valuable asset in remaining competitive.

Regardless of what license Open Source projects leverage, and regardless of what commercialization/monetization models companies leverage... I believe that the commercial organizations at the very least be _proactively_ giving _something_ back.  Even if it is just filing bug reports, or promoting a project.

Without that, everyone loses, and the OS community would be getting advantage of by commercial interests... something I hope never happens.

That being said, I hope to see more companies like Untangle which rely heavily on open source, and also contribure heavily back.  Thats great to see, and I look forward to seeing more companies follow the lead that Untangle has set forth, in that respect.

Happy Weekend!

-ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that for all kinds of companies (IT or not) Open Source communities/software/etc. is going to be a valuable asset in remaining competitive.</p>
<p>Regardless of what license Open Source projects leverage, and regardless of what commercialization/monetization models companies leverage&#8230; I believe that the commercial organizations at the very least be _proactively_ giving _something_ back.  Even if it is just filing bug reports, or promoting a project.</p>
<p>Without that, everyone loses, and the OS community would be getting advantage of by commercial interests&#8230; something I hope never happens.</p>
<p>That being said, I hope to see more companies like Untangle which rely heavily on open source, and also contribure heavily back.  Thats great to see, and I look forward to seeing more companies follow the lead that Untangle has set forth, in that respect.</p>
<p>Happy Weekend!</p>
<p>-ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
